Showing posts with label Fair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fair. Show all posts
April 28, 2019
December 26, 2018
Tired Of All The Whining About China
I don't know about you, but I am so tired about all the whining about China.
- They are stealing our intellectual property.
- They are hacking into our systems.
- They are unfairly forcing us to transfer technology to them.
- They aren't opening up their market to us.
OMG stop the complaining already!
If you don't like what they are doing, then do something about it.
Tariffs are a start, but just a small one.
Seriously, if you can't incentivize them to stop the harassment and unfair trade practices by adding them to the World Trade Organization, investing in them, and partnering with them, then you need to actually compete with China.
- They steal our sh*t--you help yourself to a generous serving of theirs.
- They break into our systems--you find your way into their systems.
- They try to unfairly take away our markets and jobs--you take away theirs big time.
Everyone knows that to deal with bully, you must fight back!
The more we are scared into inaction, the worse it gets.
This doesn't mean that we should get into a military exchange with China, but we do need to get into a confrontation over what economic and global partnership should mean and look like.
China is an old and truly great nation and their people should be highly respected.
However, the USA should also be treated right, and if that means it's time for a heart to heart and some evening up of the playing field then that is what has to happen.
We have to restore respect to America, not by becoming bullies ourselves, but by standing up to them when we are being taken advantage of. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
- They are stealing our intellectual property.
- They are hacking into our systems.
- They are unfairly forcing us to transfer technology to them.
- They aren't opening up their market to us.
OMG stop the complaining already!
If you don't like what they are doing, then do something about it.
Tariffs are a start, but just a small one.
Seriously, if you can't incentivize them to stop the harassment and unfair trade practices by adding them to the World Trade Organization, investing in them, and partnering with them, then you need to actually compete with China.
- They steal our sh*t--you help yourself to a generous serving of theirs.
- They break into our systems--you find your way into their systems.
- They try to unfairly take away our markets and jobs--you take away theirs big time.
Everyone knows that to deal with bully, you must fight back!
The more we are scared into inaction, the worse it gets.
This doesn't mean that we should get into a military exchange with China, but we do need to get into a confrontation over what economic and global partnership should mean and look like.
China is an old and truly great nation and their people should be highly respected.
However, the USA should also be treated right, and if that means it's time for a heart to heart and some evening up of the playing field then that is what has to happen.
We have to restore respect to America, not by becoming bullies ourselves, but by standing up to them when we are being taken advantage of. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
Tired Of All The Whining About China
November 2, 2018
At The Border: Immigration Or War
So it's interesting how this whole immigration crisis is playing out in real life and simultaneously on TV.
In real life, we have a caravan of thousands of people marching from Central America (Honduras and Guatemala) to the U.S. border seeking asylum, mostly for economic reasons.
On TV, we have the Last Ship Season 5, where South and Central America are at war with the U.S., "no longer willing to sit at the children's table of international politics," and they are coming to the U.S. to fight.
In the U.S. today, there are over 40 million people that were born in another country. Of these, there are over 12 million immigrants living illegally in the U.S. (55% from Mexico), and we know that we need immigration reform.
In the truest sense, we are almost all of us immigrants to this country, with ourselves or our families coming over at one time or another, and we are grateful for the generosity and open doors that allowed us to come here and make a good life.
Of course, we want to pay it forward and give others the same asylum and opportunity that we had and which they as human beings deserve.
Yet, the country continues to debate the mix of compassion and giving to the oppressed and needy versus the merit principles for bringing in needed skills, talents, and investment, and how many is the "right" number to allow in at any one time.
In real life, we are beefing up border agents, building a wall, and calling in the military to halt the illegal flow of immigrants, so that we can channel immigrates through a process and vetting that leads to legal and safe immigration to this country
On TV, we are fighting in the air, on land, and at sea an alliance of countries from the south and central that want to take over the U.S., and we are also holding our own and holding them back.
In both cases, we need to have and maintain borders to be a sovereign country, to protect our country, and to ensure that caravans of illegal immigrants or foreign troops are not crossing the border and doing harm.
It's high time for true immigration reform that is compassionate yet principled, but overrunning the border isn't an option that is practical or fair. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
In real life, we have a caravan of thousands of people marching from Central America (Honduras and Guatemala) to the U.S. border seeking asylum, mostly for economic reasons.
On TV, we have the Last Ship Season 5, where South and Central America are at war with the U.S., "no longer willing to sit at the children's table of international politics," and they are coming to the U.S. to fight.
In the U.S. today, there are over 40 million people that were born in another country. Of these, there are over 12 million immigrants living illegally in the U.S. (55% from Mexico), and we know that we need immigration reform.
In the truest sense, we are almost all of us immigrants to this country, with ourselves or our families coming over at one time or another, and we are grateful for the generosity and open doors that allowed us to come here and make a good life.
Of course, we want to pay it forward and give others the same asylum and opportunity that we had and which they as human beings deserve.
Yet, the country continues to debate the mix of compassion and giving to the oppressed and needy versus the merit principles for bringing in needed skills, talents, and investment, and how many is the "right" number to allow in at any one time.
In real life, we are beefing up border agents, building a wall, and calling in the military to halt the illegal flow of immigrants, so that we can channel immigrates through a process and vetting that leads to legal and safe immigration to this country
On TV, we are fighting in the air, on land, and at sea an alliance of countries from the south and central that want to take over the U.S., and we are also holding our own and holding them back.
In both cases, we need to have and maintain borders to be a sovereign country, to protect our country, and to ensure that caravans of illegal immigrants or foreign troops are not crossing the border and doing harm.
It's high time for true immigration reform that is compassionate yet principled, but overrunning the border isn't an option that is practical or fair. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
At The Border: Immigration Or War
July 12, 2017
Getting To Yes
I thought this was a good and important customer service principle:
When it comes to customer service, the default for reasonable requests from good customers should always be YES!
We can either make the experience miserable for the customer and leave them fuming, never coming back, and bad-mouthing us or we can make it fair, easy, accommodating, and a WOW experience!
Why not build your customer base and reputation for excellence rather than erode it?
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
"Don't make me go through NO
To get to YES."
When it comes to customer service, the default for reasonable requests from good customers should always be YES!
We can either make the experience miserable for the customer and leave them fuming, never coming back, and bad-mouthing us or we can make it fair, easy, accommodating, and a WOW experience!
Why not build your customer base and reputation for excellence rather than erode it?
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
Getting To Yes
July 7, 2017
Any Objectivity Out There Please?
Just want to pose a question to close out this week...
A recent Harvard study "confirms media bias" against Trump with negative media reports outpacing positive ones by 80:20.
Some outlets are posting at an incredible 13:1 rate for negative reporting!
Can CNN, the New York Times, and other mass media outlets get back to objective news reporting once again?
This doesn't mean avoiding real investigative journalism and honest criticism where due.
But rather it should be fair, balanced, and work to get to truth.
We can hold dear the First Amendment and do it with genuine integrity too.
This would be a great day for America! ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
A recent Harvard study "confirms media bias" against Trump with negative media reports outpacing positive ones by 80:20.
Some outlets are posting at an incredible 13:1 rate for negative reporting!
Can CNN, the New York Times, and other mass media outlets get back to objective news reporting once again?
This doesn't mean avoiding real investigative journalism and honest criticism where due.
But rather it should be fair, balanced, and work to get to truth.
We can hold dear the First Amendment and do it with genuine integrity too.
This would be a great day for America! ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
Any Objectivity Out There Please?
Labels:
Alternative Facts,
America,
Balanced,
Bias,
CNN,
Fair,
Fake News,
First Amendment,
Integrity,
Media,
Negativity,
New York Times,
News,
Objectivity,
Photo,
Politics,
Propaganda,
Spin,
Trump,
Truth
July 2, 2017
CNN News May (Sometimes) Be Fake, But The Flowers Aren't
As CNN (and other news outlets) continue to go after the President of the United States with a vehemence, and three of its journalists had to resign, I thought it was important to remember that while there may be much news these days that is ugly and fake, there are still many things in life that are still beautiful and real like these gorgeous flowers.
While we look to the media for honest and fair news reporting to educate and inform us all, it continues to be more than disappointing that they not only seem to take sides, but as one of their own producers admitted, they are looking out for their own ratings more than for the benefit of the American and global news consumer.
Political biases, chasing after ratings, alternative facts, fake news...what are people across the political and viewpoint spectrum to do to get to the truth? ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
While we look to the media for honest and fair news reporting to educate and inform us all, it continues to be more than disappointing that they not only seem to take sides, but as one of their own producers admitted, they are looking out for their own ratings more than for the benefit of the American and global news consumer.
Political biases, chasing after ratings, alternative facts, fake news...what are people across the political and viewpoint spectrum to do to get to the truth? ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
CNN News May (Sometimes) Be Fake, But The Flowers Aren't
Labels:
Alternative Facts,
Balanced,
Bias,
CNN,
Communications Management,
Educate,
Fair,
Fake News,
Flowers,
Inform,
Investigative Journalism,
New York Times,
Photo,
Politics,
Propaganda,
Ratings,
Spin,
Trump,
Trust,
Truth
May 1, 2017
Fake News CNN and Failing NYT
The Failing New York Times and Fake News CNN...
Have become virtually unwatchable.
Aside from their relentless bias, they are so endlessly the negative Nellies and depressing!
How about reporting the news instead of trying to direct it?
On the positive side of things, I heard that FOX news is turning even more mainstream.
And a new conservative network news channel is in the making to balance out the other news lineup already out there.
Thank G-d, we have choices and they can be more truthful, more fair and balanced, and more spirited and enjoyable to read and watch.
It doesn't matter what your political leaning is--we value them all as long as we respect everyone and have a honest debate of ideas--and not 24/7 mind control and a media brainwashing session over the masses. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
Fake News CNN and Failing NYT
Labels:
Balanced,
Brainwashing,
CNN,
Communications Management,
Deception,
Diversity,
Donald Trump,
Fair,
Fake News,
Funny,
Lies,
Media,
Mind Control,
Negative Nellie,
New York Times,
Photo,
PsyOps,
Respect,
Spin
January 22, 2017
Not A Newspaper, But Rather A Hatepaper
Many are raising concerns about media bias and censorship in this most polarizing of times for our nation.
Media like the New York Times that many used to look up to is endlessly going after the President of the United States and has become a hateful disgrace for its bias, hyperbole, and rancor.
Media like the New York Times that many used to look up to is endlessly going after the President of the United States and has become a hateful disgrace for its bias, hyperbole, and rancor.
No longer a respectful investigative and informative newspaper, it's now become a bona fide one-sided, bigoted, hatepaper.
Sure, media is going to represent the views of its owners, but today's New York Times is what happens when hate and party politics become it's sole purpose for being.
When people and media are balanced, fair, and rational, they present good and bad--both sides of the argument.
When they are biased and hateful and simply a tool for power elite propaganda and mind control then this is what you get...the New York Times Sunday Review Section--here's a list of their articles today:
- The Commander in Chief Who Buried HumilityYes, our freedom and democracy is under attack by bias and bigotry, but perhaps you need to look closer at the supposedly mainstream newspapers that you are reading for the true hateful filled columns that they have come to represent.
- How to Listen to Donald Trump Every Day for Years
- Why Would We Need To March?
- Racial Progress, Then Racist Progress
- Under The Big Top (Apparently the circus [Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey] couldn't compete against a Trump presidency)
- Sheer Dispair
- The America We Lost When Trump Won
- Placing a Bet on the New President (I've Been hearing he's surrounding himself with swampy people)
- The Tempting of the Media (The traps for the press in the Trump era)
- Why I Cannot Fall in Line Behind Trump
May G-d save this republic from not only corrupt politicians, but also a media that is in some cases no better, and perhaps as in this case, maybe even worse.
Who are the deplorables when the windows of innocents are being smashed, the cars being burnt, threats of bombing the White House are broadcast, and the hate-mongering media keeps bashing and bashing and bashing. ;-)
(Source Photo: Rebecca Blumenthal)
Not A Newspaper, But Rather A Hatepaper
Labels:
Balanced,
Bashing,
Bias,
Bigotry,
Censorship,
Corruption,
Democracy,
Deplorable,
Disgrace,
Divisiveness,
Fair,
Fake News,
Hate,
Informative,
New York Times,
Newspaper,
Politics,
Propaganda,
Threats,
Violence
November 4, 2016
Manage As A Mensch
So I was watching Shark Tank and they gave an update on how one of the products, "Mensch on a Bench," is doing.
It's selling in Bed, Bath, and Beyond and has exceeded 100,000 units already!
Aside from the doll and book, they are working on Mensch apps, activity kits, and candy bars.
The founder said, "It is hilarious and heartwarming to see all the different ways that families can incorporate Mensches into their lives."
This got me thinking about how being a mensch can also be incorporated into being a great manager!
- Treating people decently and fairly
- Empowering them to do their jobs well
- Empathizing with them as human beings
- Appreciating the power of diversity
- Respecting everyone and their points of view
- Recognizing and rewarding a job well done
Unfortunately, there are too many bad bosses out there that micromanage and abuse their people.
They are arbitrary and dictatorial and never ask what anyone else thinks; they dump the work on their people, but don't lend a hand; they steal their ideas and take credit for their work; on top of it, they might even then stab them in the back when they're not looking; ah, forget about showing any sort of appreciation or kindness--it's dog eat dog.
Hence, being a mensch first is a management must!
Think about people, not as a means to an end, but as an end unto themselves--they are souls interacting with your soul.
Kindness, compassion, empathy...but keep your eyes on the important work and mission you are doing.
Get it done together, as a team, collaboratively, and with everyone contributing towards the endgame.
(Live and) manage as a mensch! ;-)
(Source Photo: here with attribution to Bed, Bath, and Beyond)
It's selling in Bed, Bath, and Beyond and has exceeded 100,000 units already!
Aside from the doll and book, they are working on Mensch apps, activity kits, and candy bars.
The founder said, "It is hilarious and heartwarming to see all the different ways that families can incorporate Mensches into their lives."
This got me thinking about how being a mensch can also be incorporated into being a great manager!
- Treating people decently and fairly
- Empowering them to do their jobs well
- Empathizing with them as human beings
- Appreciating the power of diversity
- Respecting everyone and their points of view
- Recognizing and rewarding a job well done
Unfortunately, there are too many bad bosses out there that micromanage and abuse their people.
They are arbitrary and dictatorial and never ask what anyone else thinks; they dump the work on their people, but don't lend a hand; they steal their ideas and take credit for their work; on top of it, they might even then stab them in the back when they're not looking; ah, forget about showing any sort of appreciation or kindness--it's dog eat dog.
Hence, being a mensch first is a management must!
Think about people, not as a means to an end, but as an end unto themselves--they are souls interacting with your soul.
Kindness, compassion, empathy...but keep your eyes on the important work and mission you are doing.
Get it done together, as a team, collaboratively, and with everyone contributing towards the endgame.
(Live and) manage as a mensch! ;-)
(Source Photo: here with attribution to Bed, Bath, and Beyond)
Manage As A Mensch
December 31, 2013
Unjust Justice
The Wall Street Journal quotes U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf who offered advice to young judges, as follows:
"It's not your job to save the world. Do law, leave justice to Clint Eastwood."
What a notion he has--that it is not a judges job to mete out justice--how (oxy)moronic!
Instead, the judge says that is for vigilantes like Clint Eastwood's role in Dirty Harry (or perhaps Charles Bronson in Death Wish).
While I understand that the law is the law, you would think that a judge's role is to not only ensure that it is applied evenly, but also that it is meted out fairly.
As it says in the Torah/Bible (Deuteronomy 16:20), "Justice, Justice shall you pursue."
It is not enough for the "justice system" to enforce laws brainlessly, but the role of the judicial branch is to interrupt the law so that justice results.
What a contrast to even the bumbling inspector, Clouseau, in the movie, The Pink Panther, who knows "Yuri, the trainer who trains," but some of our judges don't seem to know that they are judges who sit in judgement.
So much for "jurisprudence"--but without any prudence!
Doing law, without pursuing justice is like dehydrated water in this picture--empty and good for nothing. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
"It's not your job to save the world. Do law, leave justice to Clint Eastwood."
What a notion he has--that it is not a judges job to mete out justice--how (oxy)moronic!
Instead, the judge says that is for vigilantes like Clint Eastwood's role in Dirty Harry (or perhaps Charles Bronson in Death Wish).
While I understand that the law is the law, you would think that a judge's role is to not only ensure that it is applied evenly, but also that it is meted out fairly.
As it says in the Torah/Bible (Deuteronomy 16:20), "Justice, Justice shall you pursue."
It is not enough for the "justice system" to enforce laws brainlessly, but the role of the judicial branch is to interrupt the law so that justice results.
What a contrast to even the bumbling inspector, Clouseau, in the movie, The Pink Panther, who knows "Yuri, the trainer who trains," but some of our judges don't seem to know that they are judges who sit in judgement.
So much for "jurisprudence"--but without any prudence!
Doing law, without pursuing justice is like dehydrated water in this picture--empty and good for nothing. ;-)
(Source Photo: Andy Blumenthal)
Unjust Justice
Labels:
Common Sense,
Fair,
Interpretation,
Judge,
Jurisprudence,
Justice,
Law,
Oxymoron,
Photo,
Responsibility,
Righteousness,
The Pink Panther,
Torah,
Vigilante
November 14, 2013
The Backlash Against Performance Reviews
So there is big backlash against employee performance reviews.
Bloomberg BusinessWeek declares the annual performance review to be "worthless."
The performance review ritual is traced back to the 1930's with Harvard Business School Professor, Elton Mayo, who found that productivity and satisfaction of workers improved when they were measured and paid attention to. This was referred to as the Hawthorne Effect because the study was conducted at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric outside Chicago.
Later in the 1950's, the Performance Rating Act institutionalized mandated performance reviews for federal workers,
But studies in the last 2 decades have found employees (42%) dissatisfied with the process and even HR managers (58%) disliking the system.
Clinical Psychologist, Aubrey Daniels, call the process "sadistic!"
The annual reviews are disliked for many reasons including the process being:
1) Arbitrary, subjective, and personality-driven rather than objective, meaningful, and performance-based.
2) Feedback that is too little and too late, instead of real-time when good or bad performance behavior occurs.
3) A power tool that managers use in a "culture of domination" as opposed to something that really helps employees improve.
4) Something used to punish people and build a case against employees to "get rid of you" rather than to reward and recognize them.
At the same time, this week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Microsoft and other companies are getting rid of forced employee rankings.
The ranking system was developed by General Electric in the 1980's under Jack Welch and has been referred to as ""Stack Rankings," "Forced Rankings" and "Rank and Yank."
Under this system, employees are ranked on a scale--with a certain percentage of employees (at GE 10% and Microsoft 5%, for example) ranked in the lowest level.
The lowest ranked employees then are either let go or marginalized as underperformers getting no bonuses, equity awards, or promotions.
"At least 30% of Fortune 500 companies continue to rank employees along a curve."
Microsoft is dumping the annual quantitative ranking and replacing it with more frequent qualitative evaluations.
UCLA Professor, Samuel Colbert, says this is long overdue for a yanking at companies and managers' jobs is "not to evaluate," but rather "to make everyone a five."
While this certainly sounds very nice and kumbaya-ish, it also seems to reflect the poor job that managers have done in appraising employees fairly and working with them to give them a genuine chance to learn and improve, before pulling the rating/ranking trigger that can kill employees career prospects.
A bad evaluation not only marginalizes an employee at their current position, but it limits their ability to find something else.
Perhaps, this is where the qualitative aspect really comes into play in terms of having frank, but honest discussions with employees on what they are doing well and where they can do better, and how they can get the training and experience they need.
It's really when an employee just doesn't want to improve, pull their weight, and is undermining the mission and the team that performance action needs to be taken.
I don't think we can ever do without performance reviews, but we can certainly do them better in terms of providing constructive feedback rather than destructive criticism and using this to drive bona-fide continuous improvement as opposed to employee derision.
This is possible where there are participants willing to listen to a fair critique and work together on getting to the next level professionally and for the good of the organization. ;-)
(Source Photo: here with attribution to Mediocre2010)
Bloomberg BusinessWeek declares the annual performance review to be "worthless."
The performance review ritual is traced back to the 1930's with Harvard Business School Professor, Elton Mayo, who found that productivity and satisfaction of workers improved when they were measured and paid attention to. This was referred to as the Hawthorne Effect because the study was conducted at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric outside Chicago.
Later in the 1950's, the Performance Rating Act institutionalized mandated performance reviews for federal workers,
But studies in the last 2 decades have found employees (42%) dissatisfied with the process and even HR managers (58%) disliking the system.
Clinical Psychologist, Aubrey Daniels, call the process "sadistic!"
The annual reviews are disliked for many reasons including the process being:
1) Arbitrary, subjective, and personality-driven rather than objective, meaningful, and performance-based.
2) Feedback that is too little and too late, instead of real-time when good or bad performance behavior occurs.
3) A power tool that managers use in a "culture of domination" as opposed to something that really helps employees improve.
4) Something used to punish people and build a case against employees to "get rid of you" rather than to reward and recognize them.
At the same time, this week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Microsoft and other companies are getting rid of forced employee rankings.
The ranking system was developed by General Electric in the 1980's under Jack Welch and has been referred to as ""Stack Rankings," "Forced Rankings" and "Rank and Yank."
Under this system, employees are ranked on a scale--with a certain percentage of employees (at GE 10% and Microsoft 5%, for example) ranked in the lowest level.
The lowest ranked employees then are either let go or marginalized as underperformers getting no bonuses, equity awards, or promotions.
"At least 30% of Fortune 500 companies continue to rank employees along a curve."
Microsoft is dumping the annual quantitative ranking and replacing it with more frequent qualitative evaluations.
UCLA Professor, Samuel Colbert, says this is long overdue for a yanking at companies and managers' jobs is "not to evaluate," but rather "to make everyone a five."
While this certainly sounds very nice and kumbaya-ish, it also seems to reflect the poor job that managers have done in appraising employees fairly and working with them to give them a genuine chance to learn and improve, before pulling the rating/ranking trigger that can kill employees career prospects.
A bad evaluation not only marginalizes an employee at their current position, but it limits their ability to find something else.
Perhaps, this is where the qualitative aspect really comes into play in terms of having frank, but honest discussions with employees on what they are doing well and where they can do better, and how they can get the training and experience they need.
It's really when an employee just doesn't want to improve, pull their weight, and is undermining the mission and the team that performance action needs to be taken.
I don't think we can ever do without performance reviews, but we can certainly do them better in terms of providing constructive feedback rather than destructive criticism and using this to drive bona-fide continuous improvement as opposed to employee derision.
This is possible where there are participants willing to listen to a fair critique and work together on getting to the next level professionally and for the good of the organization. ;-)
(Source Photo: here with attribution to Mediocre2010)
The Backlash Against Performance Reviews
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)